Reader Reply

School Administrator, August 2022


‘Sinister’ Agendas

Thanks to superintendent Mark Lane for the concise, direct and beautifully written My View column (“Our ‘Sinister’ Agendas”) in the April 2022 issue. He encapsulates the experiences over the past two years (layered on top of COVID) in my school district — and just so perfectly sums up what so many of us are experiencing now in school board meetings and elsewhere. 

My 3,300-student school district just outside of Champaign-Urbana, Ill., is growing and becoming more diverse in every way. This has presented challenges in that political views are becoming more diverse and, in some cases, extreme. The demands to remove books from reading lists, micromanage the work of teachers, publicly condemn and criticize and believe a wealth of misinformation can be frustrating and discouraging.  

Like Lane’s school district, we also have our reading materials, standards and essential questions posted on our website. It’s a continual work in progress, and I appreciated reading about what he has done in Decorah, Iowa.

LINDSEY A. HALL
SUPERINTENDENT,
MAHOMET-SEYMOUR CUSD 3,
MAHOMET, ILL.

 
As a retired, 17-year superintendent in rural Illinois, I was particularly moved by Mark Lane’s column. The way he professionally defended the work of faculty, administration and school boards was simply exemplary.  

I continue to work with school districts in Illinois, and I’m often frustrated at the lack of courage of too many superintendents who remain quiet when they clearly see colleagues and themselves under attack by those who do not take the time to learn all sides of a story.

As a superintendent, I found plenty of times when it felt like “the unknowing were making the unwilling do the unnecessary.” Bureaucrats and some who pretend to be public school advocates do not have the same perspective nor passion that Lane does. I thank him for his courage.  

SCOTT D. KUFFEL
RETIRED AASA MEMBER,
KEWANEE, ILL.
 
 
Navigating Discussions

I want and need every single student in our college’s teacher development program to read Peter Stiepleman’s “Navigating Discussions of Race and Class” (April 2022). Words such as equity are so abstract until they see a leader work in and throughout the community to bring this work—the hard, but necessary work of equity and inclusion—to life in our local school district. 

In my role as a teaching professor and director of elementary education at University of Missouri’s College of Education and Human Development, I, quite simply, teach aspiring teachers. Yet as my colleagues and peers in higher and K-12 education know, nothing is simple about teaching issues of race and class. 

Undoubtedly, incredible books and resources and media clips (both social and traditional) are available to spark critical thinking and dialogue among our pre-service teachers. However, it can be difficult to make those resources feel relevant, to feel immediately useful as our students enter our local school district as early career pre-service teachers. 

Enter Stiepleman’s voice as a visible, local, perfectly imperfect leader. His head and heart are fully on display in his critical thought-piece that is part rule book, part play book, and part post-game film — all bound together by his commitment to his teachers, students and families, and the greater community he serves. 

Through his self-reflections, our students can see a servant leader navigating such a complex landscape in real time. They can grab on to the Human-Centered School Transformation Model and track how each “trailhead” influenced Stiepleman’s decisions and lessons learned. We use terms like empathy and growth mindset and connectedness all of the time in our teacher education program. But what do those words look like in action? What do those works sound like in a district with leadership committed to inclusion and belongingness? What do they feel like to the students and families and teachers who will flourish in a community that gets it right? I’m grateful Stiepleman introduced us to such a powerful leadership model to explore those questions.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I want and need every single student in our college’s teacher development program to read his “Navigating Discussions of Race and Class” article in your magazine. Words such as equity are so abstract until they see a leader work in and throughout the community to bring this work— the hard, but necessary work of equity and inclusion — to life in our local district. 

It is through Stiepleman’s words and examples that we (i.e., teachers who teach teachers) can transform the abstract to the concrete—an experience that will better prepare pre-services teachers to contribute to their host schools as future educators and informed citizens. 

LEIGH NEIER
PROFESSOR AND DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION,
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI,
COLUMBIA, MO.

 

Peter Stipeleman’s article inspires me to always work and learn to become a better leader and to be willing to lead with vulnerability. His use of the After Action Review should become routine to our most important initiatives which never really end. His analysis of the work undertaken at CPS is insightful and instructive for those of us engaged in the same space.      

JEFFERY C. LASHLEY
PRESIDENT,
MOBERLY AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, 
MOBERLY, MO.
 
 

Letters should be addressed to: Editor, School Administrator, 1615 Duke St., Alexandria, VA 22314. Email: magazine@aasa.org